On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 19:48 +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 15:52 +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 13:00 +0000, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:51:56PM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > > >  Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |  9 +++++++++
> > > >  kernel/events/core.c                | 37 
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 
> > > > b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > index 4c81a86..8ead8d8 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > 
> > > > @@ -2763,6 +2764,14 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can 
> > > > also be entirely omitted.
> > > >                         allocator.  This parameter is primarily for 
> > > > debugging
> > > >                         and performance comparison.
> > > >  
> > > > +       perf_use_local_clock
> > > > +                       [PERF]
> > > > +                       Use local_clock() as a source for perf 
> > > > timestamps
> > > > +                       generation. This was be the default behaviour 
> > > > and
> > > > +                       this parameter can be used to maintain backward
> > > > +                       compatibility or on older hardware with 
> > > > expensive
> > > > +                       monotonic clock source.
> > > > +
> > > >         pf.             [PARIDE]
> > > >                         See Documentation/blockdev/paride.txt.
> > > 
> > > So I'm always terminally confused on the naming of kernel parameters,
> > > sometimes things are modules (even when they're not actually =m capable)
> > > and get a module::foo naming or so and sometimes they're not.
> > 
> > I guess you mean module.foo?
> > 
> > > So we want to use the module naming thing or not?
> > 
> > Honestly, I don't mind either way. For one thing ftrace doesn't bother
> > and just uses __setup() as well.
> 
> There's one more thing to this - as far as I remember, the module name
> is actually derived from the compilation unit name (at some level of
> Kbuild). I may be wrong (will have to double check), but a module
> parameter defined in kernel/events/core.c may be called something like
> "core.parameter" ;-).

Ok, so it's possible to enforce "perf." prefix:

/* You can override this manually, but generally this should match the
   module name. */
#ifdef MODULE
#define MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX /* empty */
#else
#define MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX KBUILD_MODNAME "."
#endif

So, perf_use_local_clock or perf.use_local_clock? :-)

Pawel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to