On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20 2015 at 4:52:59 pm GMT, Liviu Dudau <liviu.du...@arm.com>
> wrote:
> > During a recent cleanup of the arm64 DTs it has become clear that
> > the handling of PPIs in xxxx_set_type() is incorrect. The ARM TRMs
> > for GICv2 and later allow for "implementation defined" support for
> > setting the edge or level type of the PPI interrupts and don't restrict
> > the activation level of the signal. Current ARM implementations
> > do restrict the PPI level type to IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW, but licensees
> > of the IP can decide to shoot themselves in the foot at any time.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.du...@arm.com>
>
> For the GIC and GICv3 parts:
>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
So I queue that if there are no further objections from Russell or the
DT folks.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
