Please read:
http://www.adapti.com/instruction-trace.html
It's part of an advertisement, but will tell you the problems
you will have with a "software solution". Basically, software
can't do it. Also, even hardware won't give you the real
picture because there is too much going on inside the CPUs
that you can't see. However a hardware/software solution
can produce some useful information but it's not very accurate.
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Adnan Khaleel wrote:
Hi there,
I'm a hardware designer and I'm interested in collecting dynamic execution
traces in Linux. I've looked at several trace toolkits available for Linux
currently but none of them offer the level of detail that I need. Ideally I
would like to be able to record the instructions being executed on an SMP
system along with markers for system or user space in addition to process id. I
need these traces in order to evaluate the data sharing, coherence traffic etc
in larger SMP systems. I've tried several other approaches to collecting
execution traces namely via machine emulators etc but so far I've been dogged
with the problem of trying to get any OS up and running stably on a
multiprocessor configuration.
Is there a Linux kernel patch that will let me do this? I have considered using
User Mode Linux but I'm not sure if this is the correct approach either - if
any of you think that this is the easier path, I'd be interested in exploring
this more. Other things that have crossed my mind is to use a gdb or the kernel
debugger interface in order to collect the instructions but I'm not sure if
this would be the correct path. Also I do require the tool/patch to be stable
enough so that I can run commercial benchmarks on it reliably.
I understand that recording every executed instruction can considerably slow
down the application and may be considerably different from the freely running
application but nevertheless I think that some trace is better than no trace
and this is where I am at the moment.
If any of you have had experiences in profiling the kernel etc by collecting
actual kernel instructions executed, I'd be interested in seeing if that may be
extended for my purpose.
Thanks
Adnan
PS: I'm not subscribed to this mailing list so I'd appreciated if you would cc
me on the responses.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.6.12 on an i686 machine (5537.79 BogoMips).
Notice : All mail here is now cached for review by Dictator Bush.
98.36% of all statistics are fiction.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
