Chanwoo, On 02/02/15 07:04, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > Hi Roger, > > On 01/30/2015 11:05 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 30/01/15 13:04, Roger Quadros wrote: >>> Felipe & Chanwoo, >>> >>> On 26/01/15 14:15, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>> The recommended name for USB-Host cable state is "USB-Host" and not >>>> "USB-HOST" as per drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c extcon_cable_name. >>>> >>>> Change all instances of "USB-HOST" to "USB-Host". >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rog...@ti.com> >>>> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> >>>> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> >>> >>> This patch has no dependency to the rest so can be picked up as soon as >>> possible. >>> >>> Do you think it is better to go via the USB tree? >>> If yes then Chanwoo, can you please Ack this one? Thanks. >>> >>> This would mean that only the first patch needs to go through extcon tree >>> as Tony >>> will pick the rest. >> >> Hold on. Let's first decide what we really want to go ahead with >> "USB-Host" or "USB-HOST". > > Currently, extcon driver have used the specific cable name(USB-Host or > USB-HOST) > without any standard way. So, I have plan to define common cable name in > extcon > header file by using capital letter.
OK. In that case, this patch is not required. I will resend patch 1 with cable name corrected to "USB-HOST". cheers, -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
