On Tuesday, February 03, 2015 07:25:39 PM SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 19:21:21 +0100
>
> The cpufreq_cooling_unregister() function tests whether its argument is NULL
> and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
Queued up for 3.20, thanks!
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
> index fde97d6..bab67db 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
> @@ -320,8 +320,7 @@ static int cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> struct private_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
>
> - if (priv->cdev)
> - cpufreq_cooling_unregister(priv->cdev);
> + cpufreq_cooling_unregister(priv->cdev);
> dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(priv->cpu_dev, &policy->freq_table);
> of_free_opp_table(priv->cpu_dev);
> clk_put(policy->clk);
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
