On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 04:52:40PM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Thu 05 Feb 16:32 PST 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 02:08:54PM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > However this only works for the non-supply regulator properties - and > > > this is where Tim's patch is trying to sort out. > > No, this works completely fine for supply properties - to repeat what I > > said in reply to the original patch the supply is a supply to the chip > > not to an individual IP on the chip. > It does make some sense to consider the vbus-supply being connected to > the block, rather than directly to the vbus-switch. So it would work for > Tim's use case. Like I say if we do that then we don't have consistency in how we map a schematic into a DT binding - you have to dig into the binding of each device and figure out if the supply is viewed as being for blocks or for the chip as a whole and we've got the potential for problems in the binding if we figure out that a supply is actually used by other blocks later on and don't want to break existing DTs.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
