On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Sedat Dilek <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Paul E. McKenney > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 05:35:48PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: >>> On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 23:13:02 +0100 >>> Sedat Dilek <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> > OK, so both patches go through Steve's tree. >>> >>> The second patch will require acks from those that maintain the files I >>> touch. >> >> Yep, that is required either way. I will give it an Acked-by in the hope >> that this helps. You have another version on the way, or have I lost >> count? ;-) >> > > Working on x85 and probably using ed as $EDITOR, it will take some time. >
Here is proposal for v2 as a diff to the original posted to LKML. - Sedat -
--- 2-2.patch 2015-02-07 00:00:15.151621154 +0100 +++ 2-2-v2.patch 2015-02-06 23:59:22.187620716 +0100 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ From patchwork Fri Feb 6 20:06:55 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -Subject: x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline +Subject: x86/tlb/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> X-Patchwork-Id: 5794701 Message-Id: <[email protected]> @@ -70,11 +70,21 @@ code when the CPU is offline. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+icZUUGiGDoL5NU8RuxKzFjoLjEKRtUWx=jb8b9a0eqv-e...@mail.gmail.com +NOTE: This patch requires "tracing: Add condition check to RCU lockdep checks". + Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <[email protected]> +Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> +Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> --- + +[ dileks: v2: + - s/tbl/tlb in subject-line + - Add a reference to a preconditional patch + - Add Paul's Acked-by ] + include/trace/events/tlb.h | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
