On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 09:21:32AM -0800, Tim Bird wrote: > Also, when registering a regulator, you can pass a different > of_node in config (struct regulator_config) than the one in dev > (struct device)
> However, this has problems in the current code, as the test in > regulator_dev_lookup requires that the device_node found by of_get_regulator() > match the dev.of_node in the regulator in the regulator list. ... > It took me a while to figure this out, because a regulator defined > with dev.of_node != config.of_node worked fine, when accessed > directly by name (not using a supply-name). I only had problems > when I accessed the regulator using the "-supply" indirection technique > in DT. I'm not quite sure exactly what you've done here but I'm pretty sure there's some confusion somewhere since the -supply based lookups are of course what everything in mainline is doing except for CPU supplies. The fact that you are using of_get_regulator_init_data() is a bit of a red flag here, you shouldn't have to use that unless your bindings are in some way unusual.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature