Hi Baoquan,
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 06:58:34PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> This patch is very helpful and necessary since several users complained
> about the failure caused by not enough low mem. And the default value
> 256M is suitable since the testing data showed it's sufficient
> now and should be save for a long time.
>
> And it also makes sense to supress the warning from buddy allocation
> failure which will call dump_stack in x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent. Since
> it tried buddy allocation several times before the final try of bounce
> buffer allocation.
>
> So ack the whole patch set.
>
> Acked-by: Baoquan He <[email protected]>
Thanks a lot!
> Hi Joerg,
>
> Thanks for your effort on this issue.
>
> Could you please also update the cover letter or patch log to tell
> how 256M comes out with the later test result? I think it is convincing
> and helpful to understand.
Sure thing, will update the patch description before I resend the
series.
Regards,
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
