On 02/16/2015 05:45 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

>> From: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>

>> @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int
>>      __cpu_die(cpu);
>>
>>      /* CPU is completely dead: tell everyone.  Too late to complain. */
>>-     tick_cleanup_dead_cpu(cpu);
>>+     tick_takeover(cpu);

Why is tick_handover() called after __cpu_die()? And the function 
tick_takeover()
is not introduced until the next patch. tick_broadcast_takeover_bc() is the
function used instead in this patch. 

Regards
Preeti U Murthy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to