> More importantly, both kGraft and kpatch are pretty limited
> in what kinds of updates they allow, and neither kGraft nor
> kpatch has any clear path towards applying more complex
> fixes to kernel images that I can see: kGraft can only
> apply the simplest of fixes where both versions of a
> function are interchangeable, and kpatch is only marginally
> better at that - and that's pretty fundamental to both
> projects!
>
> I think all of these problems could be resolved by shooting
> for the moon instead:
>
> - work towards allowing arbitrary live kernel upgrades!
>
> not just 'live kernel patches'.
Note that live kernel upgrade would have interesting implications
outside kernel:
1) glibc does "what kernel version is this?" caches result
and alters behaviour accordingly.
2) apps will do recently_introduced_syscall(), get error
and not attempt it again.
Pavel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
