On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:05:17PM -0400, Horst von Brand wrote:
> Nicholas Hans Simmonds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Other than this, what are the general thoughts about this method as
> > opposed to just using a well defined byte order?
> 
> I'd prefer a defined byte order. That way it won't bite too hard if I
> happen to move a filesystem (image) from PC to SPARC or whatever.
> -- 
> Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
> Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
> Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
> Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513

Fair enough. With inotify now in Linus' tree, my patch will conflict
so I've fixed this in the following new patch which also stores the
xattr data in big-endian format. I've tested it this time and it
seems to work. Also if anyone can think of a neater method of byte-
swapping the structure (some sort of string operation?) I'd be glad
to hear it as the current code looks a bit ugly.

Thanks as ever,

Nicholas

diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/security.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/syscalls.h>
+#include <linux/xattr.h>
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/unistd.h>
@@ -303,6 +304,16 @@ ssize_t vfs_write(struct file *file, con
                        else
                                ret = do_sync_write(file, buf, count, pos);
                        if (ret > 0) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES
+                               struct dentry *d = file->f_dentry;
+                               if(d->d_inode->i_op && d->d_inode->i_op->
+                                                               removexattr) {
+                                       down(&d->d_inode->i_sem);
+                                       d->d_inode->i_op->removexattr(d,
+                                                               XATTR_CAP_SET);
+                                       up(&d->d_inode->i_sem);
+                               }
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES */
                                fsnotify_modify(file->f_dentry);
                                current->wchar += ret;
                        }
diff --git a/include/linux/capability.h b/include/linux/capability.h
--- a/include/linux/capability.h
+++ b/include/linux/capability.h
@@ -39,7 +39,19 @@ typedef struct __user_cap_data_struct {
         __u32 permitted;
         __u32 inheritable;
 } __user *cap_user_data_t;
-  
+
+struct cap_xattr_data {
+       __u32 version;
+       __u32 mask_effective;
+       __u32 effective;
+       __u32 mask_permitted;
+       __u32 permitted;
+       __u32 mask_inheritable;
+       __u32 inheritable;
+};
+
+#define XATTR_CAP_SET XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX "cap_set"
+
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
--- a/security/Kconfig
+++ b/security/Kconfig
@@ -60,6 +60,13 @@ config SECURITY_CAPABILITIES
          This enables the "default" Linux capabilities functionality.
          If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer Y.
 
+config SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES
+       bool "Filesystem Capabilities (EXPERIMENTAL)"
+       depends on SECURITY && EXPERIMENTAL
+       help
+         This permits a process' capabilities to be set by an extended
+         attribute in the security namespace (security.cap_set).
+
 config SECURITY_ROOTPLUG
        tristate "Root Plug Support"
        depends on USB && SECURITY
diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
--- a/security/commoncap.c
+++ b/security/commoncap.c
@@ -111,9 +111,15 @@ void cap_capset_set (struct task_struct 
 
 int cap_bprm_set_security (struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES
+       ssize_t (*bprm_getxattr)(struct dentry *,const char *,void *,size_t);
+       struct dentry *bprm_dentry;
+       ssize_t ret;
+       struct cap_xattr_data caps;
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES */
+
        /* Copied from fs/exec.c:prepare_binprm. */
 
-       /* We don't have VFS support for capabilities yet */
        cap_clear (bprm->cap_inheritable);
        cap_clear (bprm->cap_permitted);
        cap_clear (bprm->cap_effective);
@@ -134,6 +140,44 @@ int cap_bprm_set_security (struct linux_
                if (bprm->e_uid == 0)
                        cap_set_full (bprm->cap_effective);
        }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES
+       /* Locate any VFS capabilities: */
+
+       bprm_dentry = bprm->file->f_dentry;
+       if(!(bprm_dentry->d_inode->i_op &&
+                               bprm_dentry->d_inode->i_op->getxattr))
+               return 0;
+       bprm_getxattr = bprm_dentry->d_inode->i_op->getxattr;
+
+       down(&bprm_dentry->d_inode->i_sem);
+       ret = bprm_getxattr(bprm_dentry,XATTR_CAP_SET,&caps,sizeof(caps));
+       up(&bprm_dentry->d_inode->i_sem);
+       if(ret == sizeof(caps)) {
+               be32_to_cpus(&caps.version);
+               be32_to_cpus(&caps.effective);
+               be32_to_cpus(&caps.mask_effective);
+               be32_to_cpus(&caps.permitted);
+               be32_to_cpus(&caps.mask_permitted);
+               be32_to_cpus(&caps.inheritable);
+               be32_to_cpus(&caps.mask_inheritable);
+               if(caps.version == _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION) {
+                       cap_t(bprm->cap_effective) &= caps.mask_effective;
+                       cap_t(bprm->cap_effective) |= caps.effective;
+
+                       cap_t(bprm->cap_permitted) &= caps.mask_permitted;
+                       cap_t(bprm->cap_permitted) |= caps.permitted;
+
+                       cap_t(bprm->cap_inheritable) &= caps.mask_inheritable;
+                       cap_t(bprm->cap_inheritable) |= caps.inheritable;
+               } else
+                       printk(KERN_WARNING "Warning: %s capability set has "
+                               "incorrect version %08X. Correct version "
+                               "is %08X.\n",bprm->filename,caps.version,
+                               _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION);
+       }
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES */
+
        return 0;
 }
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to