On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:59:52 -0800
Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:
 
> Presumably there is some initialization missing - I suspect that the
> cached value of cr4 is from the *previous* time the CPU was up, and we
> don't correctly initialize the cached copy at early CPU bringup.

Found it. The problem is that there's two cpu_init()s in common.c. Andy
only added the cr4 init to one of them.


x86: Init per-cpu shadow copy of CR4 for i386 too

The commit 1e02ce4cccdc "x86: Store a per-cpu shadow copy of CR4" added
a shadow CR4 such that reads and writes that do not modify the CR4
execute much faster than always reading the register itself.
The change modified cpu_init() in common.c, so that the shadow CR4 gets
initialized before anything uses it. Unfortunately, there's two
cpu_init()s in common.c. There's one for x86_64 and one for i386. The
commit only added the shadow init to x86_64. The i386 needs the init
too.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: 1e02ce4cccdc "x86: Store a per-cpu shadow copy of CR4"
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index b5c8ff5e9dfc..2346c95c6ab1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1396,6 +1396,12 @@ void cpu_init(void)
 
        wait_for_master_cpu(cpu);
 
+       /*
+        * Initialize the CR4 shadow before doing anything that could
+        * try to read it.
+        */
+       cr4_init_shadow();
+
        show_ucode_info_early();
 
        printk(KERN_INFO "Initializing CPU#%d\n", cpu);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to