On 04/03/15 03:18, Yun Wu wrote:
> It's unsafe to change the configurations of an activated ITS directly
> since this will lead to unpredictable results. This patch guarantees
> the ITSes being initialized are quiescent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yun Wu <wuyun...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c 
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> index d13c24e..9e09aa0 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> @@ -1320,6 +1320,34 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops its_domain_ops = {
>       .deactivate             = its_irq_domain_deactivate,
>  };
> 
> +static int its_check_quiesced(void __iomem *base)

Another nitpick: Rather than "its_check_quiesced", how about
"its_force_quiescent" instead? Because this does a lot more than just
checking.

> +{
> +     u32 count = 1000000;    /* 1s */
> +     u32 val;
> +
> +     val = readl_relaxed(base + GITS_CTLR);
> +     if (val & GITS_CTLR_QUIESCENT)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     /* Disable the generation of all interrupts to this ITS */
> +     val &= ~GITS_CTLR_ENABLE;
> +     writel_relaxed(val, base + GITS_CTLR);
> +
> +     /* Poll GITS_CTLR and wait until ITS becomes quiescent */
> +     while (1) {
> +             val = readl_relaxed(base + GITS_CTLR);
> +             if (val & GITS_CTLR_QUIESCENT)
> +                     return 0;
> +
> +             count--;
> +             if (!count)
> +                     return -EBUSY;
> +
> +             cpu_relax();
> +             udelay(1);
> +     }
> +}
> +

I still dislike this repeated pattern, but I don't have a good solution
so far.

>  static int its_probe(struct device_node *node, struct irq_domain *parent)
>  {
>       struct resource res;
> @@ -1348,6 +1376,13 @@ static int its_probe(struct device_node *node, struct 
> irq_domain *parent)
>               goto out_unmap;
>       }
> 
> +     err = its_check_quiesced(its_base);
> +     if (err) {
> +             pr_warn("%s: failed to quiesce, giving up\n",
> +                     node->full_name);
> +             goto out_unmap;
> +     }
> +
>       pr_info("ITS: %s\n", node->full_name);
> 
>       its = kzalloc(sizeof(*its), GFP_KERNEL);
> --
> 1.8.0
> 
> 
> 

Assuming you fix the above nitpick:

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>

        M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to