3.16.7-ckt8 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me 
know.

------------------

From: Tim Chen <[email protected]>

commit 80e3d87b2c5582db0ab5e39610ce3707d97ba409 upstream.

This patch adds checks that prevens futile attempts to move rt tasks
to a CPU with active tasks of equal or higher priority.

This reduces run queue lock contention and improves the performance of
a well known OLTP benchmark by 0.7%.

Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Shawn Bohrer <[email protected]>
Cc: Suruchi Kadu <[email protected]>
Cc: Doug Nelson<[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/sched/rt.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index a49083192c64..5d720ac96246 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1336,7 +1336,12 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int 
sd_flag, int flags)
             curr->prio <= p->prio)) {
                int target = find_lowest_rq(p);
 
-               if (target != -1)
+               /*
+                * Don't bother moving it if the destination CPU is
+                * not running a lower priority task.
+                */
+               if (target != -1 &&
+                   p->prio < cpu_rq(target)->rt.highest_prio.curr)
                        cpu = target;
        }
        rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -1608,6 +1613,16 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct 
*task, struct rq *rq)
 
                lowest_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 
+               if (lowest_rq->rt.highest_prio.curr <= task->prio) {
+                       /*
+                        * Target rq has tasks of equal or higher priority,
+                        * retrying does not release any lock and is unlikely
+                        * to yield a different result.
+                        */
+                       lowest_rq = NULL;
+                       break;
+               }
+
                /* if the prio of this runqueue changed, try again */
                if (double_lock_balance(rq, lowest_rq)) {
                        /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to