3.16.7-ckt8 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Ilya Dryomov <[email protected]> commit 7eb71e0351fbb1b242ae70abb7bb17107fe2f792 upstream. It turns out it's possible to get __remove_osd() called twice on the same OSD. That doesn't sit well with rb_erase() - depending on the shape of the tree we can get a NULL dereference, a soft lockup or a random crash at some point in the future as we end up touching freed memory. One scenario that I was able to reproduce is as follows: <osd3 is idle, on the osd lru list> <con reset - osd3> con_fault_finish() osd_reset() <osdmap - osd3 down> ceph_osdc_handle_map() <takes map_sem> kick_requests() <takes request_mutex> reset_changed_osds() __reset_osd() __remove_osd() <releases request_mutex> <releases map_sem> <takes map_sem> <takes request_mutex> __kick_osd_requests() __reset_osd() __remove_osd() <-- !!! A case can be made that osd refcounting is imperfect and reworking it would be a proper resolution, but for now Sage and I decided to fix this by adding a safe guard around __remove_osd(). Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8087 Cc: Sage Weil <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <[email protected]> --- net/ceph/osd_client.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c index 18a59c60a2b7..8cbd41f5c424 100644 --- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c +++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c @@ -1006,14 +1006,24 @@ static void put_osd(struct ceph_osd *osd) */ static void __remove_osd(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc, struct ceph_osd *osd) { - dout("__remove_osd %p\n", osd); + dout("%s %p osd%d\n", __func__, osd, osd->o_osd); WARN_ON(!list_empty(&osd->o_requests)); WARN_ON(!list_empty(&osd->o_linger_requests)); - rb_erase(&osd->o_node, &osdc->osds); list_del_init(&osd->o_osd_lru); - ceph_con_close(&osd->o_con); - put_osd(osd); + rb_erase(&osd->o_node, &osdc->osds); + RB_CLEAR_NODE(&osd->o_node); +} + +static void remove_osd(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc, struct ceph_osd *osd) +{ + dout("%s %p osd%d\n", __func__, osd, osd->o_osd); + + if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&osd->o_node)) { + ceph_con_close(&osd->o_con); + __remove_osd(osdc, osd); + put_osd(osd); + } } static void remove_all_osds(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc) @@ -1023,7 +1033,7 @@ static void remove_all_osds(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc) while (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&osdc->osds)) { struct ceph_osd *osd = rb_entry(rb_first(&osdc->osds), struct ceph_osd, o_node); - __remove_osd(osdc, osd); + remove_osd(osdc, osd); } mutex_unlock(&osdc->request_mutex); } @@ -1053,7 +1063,7 @@ static void remove_old_osds(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc) list_for_each_entry_safe(osd, nosd, &osdc->osd_lru, o_osd_lru) { if (time_before(jiffies, osd->lru_ttl)) break; - __remove_osd(osdc, osd); + remove_osd(osdc, osd); } mutex_unlock(&osdc->request_mutex); } @@ -1068,8 +1078,7 @@ static int __reset_osd(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc, struct ceph_osd *osd) dout("__reset_osd %p osd%d\n", osd, osd->o_osd); if (list_empty(&osd->o_requests) && list_empty(&osd->o_linger_requests)) { - __remove_osd(osdc, osd); - + remove_osd(osdc, osd); return -ENODEV; } @@ -1869,6 +1878,7 @@ static void reset_changed_osds(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc) { struct rb_node *p, *n; + dout("%s %p\n", __func__, osdc); for (p = rb_first(&osdc->osds); p; p = n) { struct ceph_osd *osd = rb_entry(p, struct ceph_osd, o_node); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
