On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 18:26 -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >> That's not what this is about. New lock _owners_ need to worry about > ^^^ make that "need not"
Sorry, could you explain a bit why new owner can't be scheduled out(on_cpu becomes zero)? If that is possible, it still can cause soft lockup like current problem. Thanks, Ming Lei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
