On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Dan Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Boaz Harrosh <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 03/05/2015 10:56 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > [..] >>> It's not "politics". Setting standards takes time and the platforms >>> in question simply jumped the gun to enable a proof-of-concept. >>> >> >> So ye, but once you have 100,000 devices out there, then the dichotomy >> between standards-takes-time vs proof-of-concept, becomes politics. > > Ok. > > ...although, I have a question about this "100,000 devices" you quote. > What's not clear to me is how many platforms are shipping with > type-12. Certainly there are very many NVDIMMs on the market, but > which off-the-shelf systems can one obtain that include type-12 > support? Not that it would change the disposition of this patch, if > platforms are in the field they're "in the field!", just clarifying > that "100,000 devices" is NVDIMMs not type-12 platforms, right?
This is a type-12 platform: http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon/C600/X9DRH-iF-NV.cfm You can order one online, for example: http://www.acmemicro.com/Product/11926/Supermicro+X9DRH-iF-NV-O+Server+Board+DP+Xeon+E5-2600+LGA2011+DDR3+SATA3+RAID+IPMI+GbE+PCIe+ATX+MBD-X9DRH-iF-NV --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
