On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Brian Norris <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:39:45PM +0100, Frans Klaver wrote: >> add_mtd_device() has a comment suggesting that the caller should have >> set dev.parent. This is required to have the device show up in sysfs, > > What do you mean "have the device show up in sysfs"? AFAICT, this only > has bearing on whether the *parent* device shows up as a sysfs symlink > within the MTD device directory. i.e.: > > /sys/class/mtd/mtd*/device > > For instance, this sort of symlink: > > /sys/class/mtd/mtd0/device -> ../../../f03e2800.nand > > It might be good to clarify this in the commit message, since you make > the problem sound worse than (I think) it is.
I do? That was definitely not my intention. I'll look into it. Thanks, Frans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
