In 3.10.y backport patch 1dba303727f52ea062580b0a9b3f0c3b462769cf,
the logic to call pm_qos_update_target was moved to __pm_qos_update_request.
However, the original code was left in function pm_qos_update_request.

Currently, if pm_qos_update_request is called where new_value !=
req->node.prio then pm_qos_update_target will be called twice in a row.
Once in pm_qos_update_request and then again in the following call to
_pm_qos_update_request.

Removing the left over code from pm_qos_update_request stops this second
call to pm_qos_update_target where the work of removing / re-adding the
new_value in the constraints list would be duplicated.

Signed-off-by: Michael Scott <michael.sc...@linaro.org>
---
 kernel/power/qos.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/power/qos.c b/kernel/power/qos.c
index 25cf89b..8703fc7 100644
--- a/kernel/power/qos.c
+++ b/kernel/power/qos.c
@@ -369,12 +369,6 @@ void pm_qos_update_request(struct pm_qos_request *req,
        }
 
        cancel_delayed_work_sync(&req->work);
-
-       if (new_value != req->node.prio)
-               pm_qos_update_target(
-                       pm_qos_array[req->pm_qos_class]->constraints,
-                       &req->node, PM_QOS_UPDATE_REQ, new_value);
-
        __pm_qos_update_request(req, new_value);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_update_request);
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to