2005/7/21, Voluspa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 2h48m at 100 HZ > 2h48m at 250 HZ > 2h47m at 1000 HZ
Now, what would be interesting is to see if the lack of differences comes from the fact that the processor has enough time to sleep, not enough time, or simply it does not matter. That is, is it a best case or a worst case ? > #!/bin/sh > touch time-hz-start > while (true) do > touch time-hz-end > sleep 1m > done Why this ? Why not simply nothing ? A computer can be idle for more than 1 minute ;-) -- Guillaume - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
