On 03/11/2015 04:23 PM, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> From: Ahmed S. Darwish <ahmed.darw...@valeo.com>
> 
> A number of tx queue wake-up events went missing due to the
> outlined scenario below. Start state is a pool of 16 tx URBs,
> active tx_urbs count = 15, with the netdev tx queue open.
> 
> start_xmit()                             tx_acknowledge()
> ............                             ................
> atomic_inc(&tx_urbs);
> if (atomic_read(&tx_urbs) >= 16) {
>                         URB completion IRQ!
>                         -->
>                                          atomic_dec(&tx_urbs);
>                                          netif_wake_queue();
>                                          return;
>                         <--
>                         end of IRQ!
>     netif_stop_queue();
> }
> 
> At the end, the correct state expected is a 15 tx_urbs count
> value with the tx queue state _open_. Due to the race, we get
> the same tx_urbs value but with the tx queue state _stopped_.
> The wake-up event is completely lost.
> 
> Thus avoid hand-rolled concurrency mechanisms and use a proper
> lock for contexts protection.

I'm missing a spin_lock_init(), right? Please compile and test your code
with everything switch on in Kernel hacking -> Lock Debugging.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to