Hi, I'm trying to get rid of at91_suspend_entering_slow_clock() which is exposing the platform suspend_state_t to the devices. From what I understand, whenever suspend_state_t is PM_SUSPEND_MEM or PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY, the pm_message_t passed to the device driver is always PM_EVENT_SUSPEND.
The requirement is to know whether we are going to cut the master clock and in that case, avoid calling enable_irq_wake() because we will not be able to wakeup from the device. Is there a better way to do that? Or should I implement a similar function in the pm core (which I guess would already be there if really needed)? Regards, -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
