From: Ilya Dryomov <[email protected]>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit cc9f1f518cec079289d11d732efa490306b1ddad upstream.

No reason to use BUG_ON for osd request list assertions.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
---
 net/ceph/osd_client.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
index 4e24b7338582..ba3330e9665d 100644
--- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c
+++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
@@ -975,8 +975,8 @@ static void put_osd(struct ceph_osd *osd)
 static void __remove_osd(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc, struct ceph_osd *osd)
 {
        dout("__remove_osd %p\n", osd);
-       BUG_ON(!list_empty(&osd->o_requests));
-       BUG_ON(!list_empty(&osd->o_linger_requests));
+       WARN_ON(!list_empty(&osd->o_requests));
+       WARN_ON(!list_empty(&osd->o_linger_requests));
 
        rb_erase(&osd->o_node, &osdc->osds);
        list_del_init(&osd->o_osd_lru);
-- 
2.3.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to