On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:44:01AM +0000, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Change the functions name:
> arm_cpuidle_suspend => arm_idle
> arm_cpuidle_init => arm_idle_cpu_init
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>
I think you can drop this patch, unless we have a compelling reason
to have same names with x86, sorry for the churn.
Lorenzo
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h | 4 ++--
> arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle.h | 6 +++---
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c | 4 ++--
> 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> index 0f84249..5f547c0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ struct of_cpuidle_method {
> __used __section(__cpuidle_method_of_table) \
> = { .method = _method, .ops = _ops }
>
> -extern int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index);
> +extern int arm_idle(int index);
>
> -extern int arm_cpuidle_init(int cpu);
> +extern int arm_idle_cpu_init(int cpu);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> index 7b42a40..05a2c3e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ int arm_cpuidle_simple_enter(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> return index;
> }
>
> -int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index)
> +int arm_idle(int index)
> {
> int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int __init arm_cpuidle_read_ops(struct device_node
> *dn, int cpu)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int __init arm_cpuidle_init(int cpu)
> +int __init arm_idle_cpu_init(int cpu)
> {
> int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> struct device_node *cpu_node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> index 141b2fc..e9c0dc4e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> @@ -4,10 +4,10 @@
> #include <asm/proc-fns.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> -extern int arm_cpuidle_init(unsigned int cpu);
> +extern int arm_idle_cpu_init(unsigned int cpu);
> extern int cpu_suspend(unsigned long arg);
> #else
> -static inline int arm_cpuidle_init(unsigned int cpu)
> +static inline int arm_idle_cpu_init(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ static inline int cpu_suspend(unsigned long arg)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
> #endif
> -static inline int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index)
> +static inline int arm_idle(int index)
> {
> return cpu_suspend(index);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c
> index a78143a..b6b4fcf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
> #include <asm/cpuidle.h>
> #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
>
> -int arm_cpuidle_init(unsigned int cpu)
> +int arm_idle_cpu_init(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> struct device_node *cpu_node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c
> index e4a6eba..37c732d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static int arm_enter_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> * call the CPU ops suspend protocol with idle index as a
> * parameter.
> */
> - arm_cpuidle_suspend(idx);
> + arm_idle(idx);
>
> cpu_pm_exit();
> }
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static int __init arm_idle_init(void)
> * idle states suspend back-end specific data
> */
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - ret = arm_cpuidle_init(cpu);
> + ret = arm_idle_cpu_init(cpu);
>
> /* This cpu does not support any idle states */
> if (ret == -ENXIO)
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
