Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This machine only has 4G of memory, so the platform code is overestimating
> > the number of pages by 50%. Can you please check your dmesg, see if your
> > system is also getting this wrong?
>
>
>
> On node 0 totalpages: 1572863
> DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:1
> Normal zone: 1568767 pages, LIFO batch:31
> HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> On node 1 totalpages: 131071
> DMA zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> Normal zone: 131071 pages, LIFO batch:31
> HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> On node 2 totalpages: 131071
> DMA zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> Normal zone: 131071 pages, LIFO batch:31
> HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> On node 3 totalpages: 131071
> DMA zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> Normal zone: 131071 pages, LIFO batch:31
> HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
That's 7.7GB, yes? On a 6GB machine?
If so, that's a bit off, but not grossly.
Here's the dopey debug patch which I used:
- boot
- dmesg -s 1000000 | grep total_pages > foo
- kill off syslogd (sudo service syslog stop)
- run the dd command
- wait for it to hit steady state (max dirty memory)
- dmesg -s 1000000 >> foo
diff -puN mm/page-writeback.c~a mm/page-writeback.c
--- 25/mm/page-writeback.c~a 2005-07-26 15:53:46.000000000 -0700
+++ 25-akpm/mm/page-writeback.c 2005-07-26 16:21:55.000000000 -0700
@@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ get_dirty_limits(struct writeback_state
dirty_ratio = vm_dirty_ratio;
if (dirty_ratio > unmapped_ratio / 2)
dirty_ratio = unmapped_ratio / 2;
-
+ printk("vm_dirty_ratio=%d unmapped_ratio=%d dirty_ratio=%d\n",
+ vm_dirty_ratio, unmapped_ratio, dirty_ratio);
if (dirty_ratio < 5)
dirty_ratio = 5;
@@ -171,6 +172,8 @@ get_dirty_limits(struct writeback_state
background = (background_ratio * available_memory) / 100;
dirty = (dirty_ratio * available_memory) / 100;
+ printk("dirty_ratio=%d available_memory=%lu dirty=%lu\n",
+ dirty_ratio, available_memory, dirty);
tsk = current;
if (tsk->flags & PF_LESS_THROTTLE || rt_task(tsk)) {
background += background / 4;
@@ -209,6 +212,12 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
get_dirty_limits(&wbs, &background_thresh,
&dirty_thresh, mapping);
nr_reclaimable = wbs.nr_dirty + wbs.nr_unstable;
+ printk("background_thresh=%ld dirty_thresh=%ld "
+ "nr_dirty=%ld nr_unstable=%ld "
+ "nr_reclaimable=%ld wbs.nr_writeback=%ld\n",
+ background_thresh, dirty_thresh,
+ wbs.nr_dirty, wbs.nr_unstable,
+ nr_reclaimable, wbs.nr_writeback);
if (nr_reclaimable + wbs.nr_writeback <= dirty_thresh)
break;
@@ -532,6 +541,8 @@ void __init page_writeback_init(void)
total_pages = nr_free_pagecache_pages();
+ printk("total_pages=%ld\n", total_pages);
+
correction = (100 * 4 * buffer_pages) / total_pages;
if (correction < 100) {
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
