On 2015/3/26 1:21, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:02:46PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> CPU hardware ID (phys_id) is defined as u32 in structure acpi_processor, >> but phys_id is used as int in acpi processor driver, so it will lead to >> some inconsistence for the drivers. >> >> Furthermore, to cater for ACPI arch ports that implement 64 bits CPU >> ids a generic CPU physical id type is required. >> >> So introduce typedef u32 phys_cpuid_t in a common file, and introduce >> a macro PHYS_CPUID_INVALID as (phys_cpuid_t)(-1) if it's not defined >> by other archs, this will solve the inconsistence in acpi processor driver, >> and will prepare for the ACPI on ARM64 for the 64 bit CPU hardware ID >> in the following patch. >> >> CC: Rafael J Wysocki <[email protected]> >> Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]> >> Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <[email protected]> >> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]> >> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]> >> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> >> [hj: reworked cpu physid map return codes] >> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <[email protected]> > BTW, am I still the author of this patch? If yes, it's missing a From: > line.
Oops, you should be the author, can Will fix this in his tree? > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c >> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct >> acpi_processor *pr) >> acpi_status status; >> int ret; >> >> - if (pr->phys_id == -1) >> + if (pr->phys_id == PHYS_CPUID_INVALID) >> return -ENODEV; > If PHYS_CPUID_INVALID is the same as INVALID_HWID, we should get rid of > the latter in the arm64 code (as a subsequent clean-up patch). OK, I'm preparing a patch set to introduce invalid_phys_cpuid() and invalid_logical_cpuid() to remove the direct comparison of PHYS_CPUID_INVALID and -1 in ACPI processor drivers, which is suggested by Rafael, I will cleanup PHYS_CPUID_INVALID in this patch set. Thanks Hanjun > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
