On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 09:48:59AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/xx/pci: remap_pfn_range -> io_remap_pfn_range > > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 01:32:00AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Greg, Martin, does the following make sense? > > > If it does, should other architectures be updated as well? > > > > > Hm, you do realize that io_remap_pfn_range() is the same thing as > > remap_pfn_range() on i386, right? > > > > So, why would this patch change anything? > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > It doesnt change any behaviour. > Its a style issue I'm trying to fix: even in arch specific code, isnt it > better > to use a generic io_remap_pfn_range to map PCI memory?
As I said above, it's the same thing on i386. But, if you are getting picky, you should fix all of the other arches too, right? Anyway, why change this, I don't really see the need. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
