3.13.11-ckt18 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let 
me know.

------------------

From: Saran Maruti Ramanara <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit cfbf654efc6d78dc9812e030673b86f235bf677d ]

When making use of RFC5061, section 4.2.4. for setting the primary IP
address, we're passing a wrong parameter header to param_type2af(),
resulting always in NULL being returned.

At this point, param.p points to a sctp_addip_param struct, containing
a sctp_paramhdr (type = 0xc004, length = var), and crr_id as a correlation
id. Followed by that, as also presented in RFC5061 section 4.2.4., comes
the actual sctp_addr_param, which also contains a sctp_paramhdr, but
this time with the correct type SCTP_PARAM_IPV{4,6}_ADDRESS that
param_type2af() can make use of. Since we already hold a pointer to
addr_param from previous line, just reuse it for param_type2af().

Fixes: d6de3097592b ("[SCTP]: Add the handling of "Set Primary IP Address" 
parameter to INIT")
Signed-off-by: Saran Maruti Ramanara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
---
 net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
index ca22389..72cf5a3 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
@@ -2608,7 +2608,7 @@ do_addr_param:
 
                addr_param = param.v + sizeof(sctp_addip_param_t);
 
-               af = sctp_get_af_specific(param_type2af(param.p->type));
+               af = sctp_get_af_specific(param_type2af(addr_param->p.type));
                if (af == NULL)
                        break;
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to