On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote: > What is the oldest gcc we want to support in kernel 2.6? > > Currently, it's 2.95 . > > I'd suggest raising this to 3.2 which should AFAIK not be a problem for > any distribution supporting kernel 2.6 .
You have all my support for this. Some weird macros and code could be removed from the tree. F.e. One could use [] instead of [0] and there is a baaad macro in include/linux/mmzone.h in need of some healing touches. > Is there any good reason why we should not drop support for older > compilers? Probably but we should drop support anyways. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
