I have some problem with this patch. YH
On 7/28/05, yhlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you mean solve the timing problem for 2 way dual core or 4 way > single core above? > > YH > > On 7/27/05, Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > sync_tsc was using smp_call_function to ask the boot processor > > to report it's tsc value. smp_call_function performs an IPI_send_allbutself > > which is a broadcast ipi. There is a window during processor startup during > > which the target cpu has started and before it has initialized it's > > interrupt > > vectors so it can properly process an interrupt. Receveing an interrupt > > during that window will triple fault the cpu and do other nasty things. > > > > Why cli does not protect us from that is beyond me. > > > > The simple fix is to match ia64 and provide a smp_call_function_single. > > Which avoids the broadcast and is more efficient. > > > > This certainly fixes the problem of getting stuck on boot which was > > very easy to trigger on my SMP Hyperthreaded Xeon, and I think > > it fixes it for the right reasons. > > > > I believe this patch suffers from apicid versus logical cpu number > > confusion. > > I copied the basic logic from smp_send_reschedule and I can't find where > > that translates from the logical cpuid to apicid. So it isn't quite > > correct yet. It should be close enough that it shouldn't be too hard > > to finish it up. > > > > More bug fixes after I have slept but I figured I needed to get this > > one out for review. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > --- > > > > arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c | 65 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c | 21 ++++++++------ > > include/asm-x86_64/smp.h | 2 + > > 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > 571d8bdc5a935b85fb0ce5ff3fac9a59a86efe6e > > diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c > > --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c > > +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c > > @@ -294,6 +294,71 @@ void unlock_ipi_call_lock(void) > > } > > > > /* > > + * this function sends a 'generic call function' IPI to one other CPU > > + * in the system. > > + */ > > +static void __smp_call_function_single (int cpu, void (*func) (void > > *info), void *info, > > + int nonatomic, int wait) > > +{ > > + struct call_data_struct data; > > + int cpus = 1; > > + > > + data.func = func; > > + data.info = info; > > + atomic_set(&data.started, 0); > > + data.wait = wait; > > + if (wait) > > + atomic_set(&data.finished, 0); > > + > > + call_data = &data; > > + wmb(); > > + /* Send a message to all other CPUs and wait for them to respond */ > > + send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of_cpu(cpu), CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR); > > + > > + /* Wait for response */ > > + while (atomic_read(&data.started) != cpus) > > + cpu_relax(); > > + > > + if (!wait) > > + return; > > + > > + while (atomic_read(&data.finished) != cpus) > > + cpu_relax(); > > +} > > + > > +/* > > + * Run a function on another CPU > > + * <func> The function to run. This must be fast and non-blocking. > > + * <info> An arbitrary pointer to pass to the function. > > + * <nonatomic> Currently unused. > > + * <wait> If true, wait until function has completed on other CPUs. > > + * [RETURNS] 0 on success, else a negative status code. > > + * > > + * Does not return until the remote CPU is nearly ready to execute <func> > > + * or is or has executed. > > + */ > > + > > +int smp_call_function_single (int cpu, void (*func) (void *info), void > > *info, > > + int nonatomic, int wait) > > +{ > > + > > + int me = get_cpu(); /* prevent preemption and reschedule on another > > processor */ > > + > > + if (cpu == me) { > > + printk("%s: trying to call self\n", __func__); > > + put_cpu(); > > + return -EBUSY; > > + } > > + spin_lock_bh(&call_lock); > > + > > + __smp_call_function_single(cpu, func,info,nonatomic,wait); > > + > > + spin_unlock_bh(&call_lock); > > + put_cpu(); > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +/* > > * this function sends a 'generic call function' IPI to all other CPUs > > * in the system. > > */ > > diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c > > --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c > > +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c > > @@ -229,9 +229,6 @@ static __cpuinit void sync_master(void * > > { > > unsigned long flags, i; > > > > - if (smp_processor_id() != boot_cpu_id) > > - return; > > - > > go[MASTER] = 0; > > > > local_irq_save(flags); > > @@ -280,7 +277,7 @@ get_delta(long *rt, long *master) > > return tcenter - best_tm; > > } > > > > -static __cpuinit void sync_tsc(void) > > +static __cpuinit void sync_tsc(unsigned int master) > > { > > int i, done = 0; > > long delta, adj, adjust_latency = 0; > > @@ -294,9 +291,17 @@ static __cpuinit void sync_tsc(void) > > } t[NUM_ROUNDS] __cpuinitdata; > > #endif > > > > + printk(KERN_INFO "CPU %d: Syncing TSC to CPU %u.\n", > > + smp_processor_id(), master); > > + > > go[MASTER] = 1; > > > > - smp_call_function(sync_master, NULL, 1, 0); > > + /* It is dangerous to broadcast IPI as cpus are coming up, > > + * as they may not be ready to accept them. So since > > + * we only need to send the ipi to the boot cpu direct > > + * the message, and avoid the race. > > + */ > > + smp_call_function_single(master, sync_master, NULL, 1, 0); > > > > while (go[MASTER]) /* wait for master to be ready */ > > no_cpu_relax(); > > @@ -340,16 +345,14 @@ static __cpuinit void sync_tsc(void) > > printk(KERN_INFO > > "CPU %d: synchronized TSC with CPU %u (last diff %ld cycles, > > " > > "maxerr %lu cycles)\n", > > - smp_processor_id(), boot_cpu_id, delta, rt); > > + smp_processor_id(), master, delta, rt); > > } > > > > static void __cpuinit tsc_sync_wait(void) > > { > > if (notscsync || !cpu_has_tsc) > > return; > > - printk(KERN_INFO "CPU %d: Syncing TSC to CPU %u.\n", > > smp_processor_id(), > > - boot_cpu_id); > > - sync_tsc(); > > + sync_tsc(boot_cpu_id); > > } > > > > static __init int notscsync_setup(char *s) > > diff --git a/include/asm-x86_64/smp.h b/include/asm-x86_64/smp.h > > --- a/include/asm-x86_64/smp.h > > +++ b/include/asm-x86_64/smp.h > > @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ extern void unlock_ipi_call_lock(void); > > extern int smp_num_siblings; > > extern void smp_flush_tlb(void); > > extern void smp_message_irq(int cpl, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs); > > +extern int smp_call_function_single (int cpuid, void (*func) (void *info), > > void *info, > > + int retry, int wait); > > extern void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu); > > extern void smp_invalidate_rcv(void); /* Process an NMI */ > > extern void zap_low_mappings(void); > > - > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/