Currently it ignores operator priority and just sets processed args as a
right operand.  But it could result in priority inversion in case that
the right operand is also a operator arg and its priority is lower.

For example, following print format is from new kmem events.

  "page=%p", REC->pfn != -1UL ? (((struct page *)(0xffffea0000000000UL)) + 
(REC->pfn)) : ((void *)0)

But this was treated as below:

  REC->pfn != ((null - 1UL) ? ((struct page *)0xffffea0000000000UL + REC->pfn) 
: (void *) 0)

In this case, the right arg was '?' operator which has lower priority.
But it just sets the whole arg so making the output confusing - page was
always 0 or 1 since that's the result of logical operation.

With this patch, it can handle it properly like following:

  ((REC->pfn != (null - 1UL)) ? ((struct page *)0xffffea0000000000UL + 
REC->pfn) : (void *) 0)

Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
---
 tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c 
b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
index 6d31b6419d37..604bea5c3fb0 100644
--- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
+++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
@@ -1939,7 +1939,22 @@ process_op(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg 
*arg, char **tok)
                        goto out_warn_free;
 
                type = process_arg_token(event, right, tok, type);
-               arg->op.right = right;
+
+               if (right->type == PRINT_OP &&
+                   get_op_prio(arg->op.op) < get_op_prio(right->op.op)) {
+                       struct print_arg tmp;
+
+                       /* swap ops according to the priority */
+                       arg->op.right = right->op.left;
+
+                       tmp = *arg;
+                       *arg = *right;
+                       *right = tmp;
+
+                       arg->op.left = right;
+               } else {
+                       arg->op.right = right;
+               }
 
        } else if (strcmp(token, "[") == 0) {
 
-- 
2.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to