On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 07:14:42PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > /* make a copy of @attrs and sanitize it */ > copy_workqueue_attrs(new_attrs, attrs); > - cpumask_and(new_attrs->cpumask, new_attrs->cpumask, > wq_unbound_global_cpumask); > + copy_workqueue_attrs(pwq_attrs, attrs); > + cpumask_and(new_attrs->cpumask, new_attrs->cpumask, cpu_possible_mask); > + cpumask_and(pwq_attrs->cpumask, pwq_attrs->cpumask, unbound_cpumask);
Hmmm... why do we need to keep track of both cpu_possible_mask and unbound_cpumask? Can't we just make unbound_cpumask replace cpu_possible_mask for unbound workqueues? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
