On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 12:49:16PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> If you have a spot where it'd be nice to do that despite it being 
> somewhat (koff).. discouraged shall we say, you have to do something 
> funky.  Thomas had a patch to not raise sirq unconditionally for -rt 
> to let nohz_full work, but it needs a lock that's converted to an 
> rtmutex in -rt, and which doesn't want to be un-converted.  Ergo, get 
> funky.

I should probably back away slowly at this point.. but got a reference
to a thread that explains the 'problem'?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to