On 04/07/15 06:47, Pramod Gurav wrote: > According to documents The RFR_LEVEL1 in UART_DM_MR1 can be
That is UART_DM_MR1 > programmed in bits 31:8 but the masks only bits 17:8. > Correct the same. > > Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h > index 8f7806d..5ff9ebf 100644 > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ > #define UART_MR1 0x0000 > > #define UART_MR1_AUTO_RFR_LEVEL0 0x3F > -#define UART_MR1_AUTO_RFR_LEVEL1 0x3FF00 > +#define UART_MR1_AUTO_RFR_LEVEL1 0xFFFFFF00 But this is UART_MR1. The two hardware cores share the same driver because the DM hardware is based on the non-DM hardware. I suppose we need to make another #define UART_DM_MR1_AUTO_RFR_LEVEL1 and then have an if (msm_port->is_uartdm) in msm_startup() path to handle the differences here. > #define UART_MR1_RX_RDY_CTL (1 << 7) > #define UART_MR1_CTS_CTL (1 << 6) > -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
