On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Ming Lei wrote:
> From: Jarod Wilson <[email protected]>
> 
> With the mutex_trylock bit gone from blkdev_reread_part(), the retry logic
> in dasd_scan_partitions() shouldn't be necessary.
> 
> CC: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> CC: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> CC: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
> CC: Alexander Viro <[email protected]>
> CC: Markus Pargmann <[email protected]>
> CC: Stefan Weinhuber <[email protected]>
> CC: Stefan Haberland <[email protected]>
> CC: Sebastian Ott <[email protected]>
> CC: Fabian Frederick <[email protected]>
> CC: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
> CC: David Herrmann <[email protected]>
> CC: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> CC: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c |   13 +++----------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
> index 2af4619..189ea2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
> @@ -99,9 +99,8 @@ void dasd_gendisk_free(struct dasd_block *block)
>  int dasd_scan_partitions(struct dasd_block *block)
>  {
>       struct block_device *bdev;
> -     int retry, rc;
> +     int rc;
> 
> -     retry = 5;
>       bdev = bdget_disk(block->gdp, 0);
>       if (!bdev) {
>               DBF_DEV_EVENT(DBF_ERR, block->base, "%s",
> @@ -118,14 +117,8 @@ int dasd_scan_partitions(struct dasd_block *block)
>       }
> 
>       rc = blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
> -     while (rc == -EBUSY && retry > 0) {
> -             schedule();
> -             rc = blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
> -             retry--;
> -             DBF_DEV_EVENT(DBF_ERR, block->base,
> -                           "scan partitions error, retry %d rc %d",
> -                           retry, rc);
> -     }
> +     DBF_DEV_EVENT(DBF_ERR, block->base,
> +                   "scan partitions error, rc %d", rc);

Could you please change that to only write the debug message in the error
case. Other than that, both dasd patches look good.

Thanks,
Sebastian

> 
>       /*
>        * Since the matching blkdev_put call to the blkdev_get in
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to