> UML is still too strange for valgrind, despite progress on both sides > (valgrind accepting more strange things and UML becoming less > strange). > > I tried grinding UML a month or so ago, and its use of clone was a > sticking point. >
I think I read your remark, yes. Thanks for the update; I hoped some strides had been made in that direction since then. Personally, I know to little about the topic to be of any use. I guess the best option is then using slab caches per object type, so that I can at least find obvious memory leaks. On a sidenote, it'll be interesting to see what valgrind reports once (if?) the kernel gets a good grinding. Willem - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
