On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:13:25 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> In function dmi_present(), dmi_walk_early() calls dmi_table(), which
> calls dmi_decode(), which ultimately calls dmi_save_uuid(). This last
> function makes a decision based on the value of global variable
> dmi_ver. The problem is that this variable is set right _after_
> dmi_walk_early() returns. So dmi_save_uuid() always sees dmi_ver == 0
> regardless of the actual version implemented.
> 
> This causes /sys/class/dmi/id/product_uuid to always use the old
> ordering even on systems implementing DMI/SMBIOS 2.6 or later, which
> should use the new ordering.
> 
> This is broken since kernel v3.8 for legacy DMI implementations and
> since kernel v3.10 for SMBIOS 2 implementations. SMBIOS 3
> implementations with the 64-bit entry point are not affected.
> 
> The first breakage does not matter much as in practice legacy DMI
> implementations are always for versions older than 2.6, which is when
> the UUID ordering changed. The second breakage is more problematic as
> it affects the vast majority of x86 systems manufactured since 2009.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 9f9c9cbb6057 ("drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c: fetch dmi version from 
> SMBIOS if it exists")
> Fixes: 79bae42d51a5 ("dmi_scan: refactor dmi_scan_machine(), 
> {smbios,dmi}_present()")
> Acked-by: Zhenzhong Duan <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
> Cc: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ivan Khoronzhuk <[email protected]>
> Cc: Matt Fleming <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected] [v3.10+]
> ---
> Changes since v1:
>  * Rebased on torvalds/linux/master.

Bah, scratch that, I have come up with a different approach that will
make backporting this fix easier. Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to