On Thu, Apr 23 2015, Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: >> > or you want attribution or ...? >> >> That would be nice. > > I fail to see for what - I see H.J. Lu's patch from Dec. 2014 and you > repeating the same patch months later.
I think we're talking past each other. What I'd like credit for is coming up with the idea of omitting the xor %eax,%eax in the first place (the original mail was sent to [email protected] [cc'ed to a few x86 maintainers], but that doesn't seem to be publicly archived). So it is very much not about (attribution for) the Makefile patch itself. > [...] it is his patch which should go because it was the first. It is > only fair this way IMO. Agreed - all I ask for is being mentioned somewhere in the commit log. Again, I only sent the April 20 patch because I hadn't seen anything happen since December. Rasmus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
