On 04/28/2015 01:35 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 28.04.2015 17:59, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:09:04AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: >>> The current implicit GPL only licensing on the device tree makes it >>> very impractical for other software components licensed under another >>> license. >>> >>> In order to make it easier for them to reuse our device trees, >>> relicense our device trees under a GPL/X11 dual-license. >>> > [...] >>> so I decided to keep the whole relicensing in a single patch. Please >>> send >>> your Acked-by's in reply to this patch if you are happy with the >>> relicensing. >> >> I normally don't include the "or later version" for my license changes >> as I've only accepted to contribute under the terms of GPLv2. > > Ok, I guess this is a NACK for GPLv2+ but an Acked-by if we limit the > GPL part to GPLv2 only? > > If so, is everybody else who already Acked the GPLv2+ part also fine > with reducing the GPL version to "version 2 only" ? >
Yeah, I'm fine with this. Acked-by: Ezequiel Garcia <[email protected]> -- Ezequiel García, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
