3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Chen Gang <[email protected]>

commit 6916b14ea140ff5c915895eefe9431888a39a84d upstream.

Under arm64, we will calibrate the delay loop statically using a known
timer frequency, so delete read_current_timer(), or it will cause
compiling issue with allmodconfig.

The related error:
  ERROR: "read_current_timer" [lib/rbtree_test.ko] undefined!
  ERROR: "read_current_timer" [lib/interval_tree_test.ko] undefined!
  ERROR: "read_current_timer" [fs/ext4/ext4.ko] undefined!
  ERROR: "read_current_timer" [crypto/tcrypt.ko] undefined!

Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/timex.h |    6 +++---
 arch/arm64/kernel/time.c       |    6 ------
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/timex.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/timex.h
@@ -16,14 +16,14 @@
 #ifndef __ASM_TIMEX_H
 #define __ASM_TIMEX_H
 
+#include <asm/arch_timer.h>
+
 /*
  * Use the current timer as a cycle counter since this is what we use for
  * the delay loop.
  */
-#define get_cycles()   ({ cycles_t c; read_current_timer(&c); c; })
+#define get_cycles()   arch_counter_get_cntvct()
 
 #include <asm-generic/timex.h>
 
-#define ARCH_HAS_READ_CURRENT_TIMER
-
 #endif
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
@@ -68,12 +68,6 @@ unsigned long long notrace sched_clock(v
        return arch_timer_read_counter() * sched_clock_mult;
 }
 
-int read_current_timer(unsigned long *timer_value)
-{
-       *timer_value = arch_timer_read_counter();
-       return 0;
-}
-
 void __init time_init(void)
 {
        u32 arch_timer_rate;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to