On Mon,  4 May 2015 13:40:20 +0200
Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> wrote:

> This means:
> * add a per-thread flag to indicate whether a task is in the old or in
>   the new universe,
> * reset it in _slow_ paths of syscall's entry/exit,
> * add helpers around the flag to sched.h,
> * export the status in /proc/<pid>/kgr_in_progress,

> @@ -217,6 +226,7 @@ ENTRY(system_call)
>       mvc     __PT_INT_CODE(4,%r11),__LC_SVC_ILC
>       stg     %r14,__PT_FLAGS(%r11)
>  .Lsysc_do_svc:
> +     HANDLE_KGRAFT %r12
>       lg      %r10,__TI_sysc_table(%r12)      # address of system call table
>       llgh    %r8,__PT_INT_CODE+2(%r11)
>       slag    %r8,%r8,2                       # shift and test for svc 0

This is not the slow path, .Lsysc_do_svc is on the main svc path. It is
"only" two instruction but nevertheless this should be avoided.
One way is to combine it with the _TIF_TRACE mechanics:

.Lsysc_nr_ok:
        xc      __SF_BACKCHAIN(8,%r15),__SF_BACKCHAIN(%r15)
        stg     %r2,__PT_ORIG_GPR2(%r11)
        stg     %r7,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD(%r15)
        lgf     %r9,0(%r8,%r10)                 # get system call add.
 ->     tm      __TI_flags+6(%r12),_TIF_TRACE>>8
 ->     jnz     .Lsysc_tracesys
        basr    %r14,%r9                        # call sys_xxxx
        stg     %r2,__PT_R2(%r11)               # store return value

Add _TIF_KGR_IN_PROGRESS to _TIF_TRACE and branch to a new label,
e.g. to .Lsysc_trace. Distinguish between _TIF_KGR_IN_PROGRESS and
the other trace reasons and either call s390_handle_kgraft or
do_syscall_trace_enter / do_syscall_trace_exit.

The same for the exit work, add _TIF_KGR_IN_PROGRESS to _TIF_WORK
and sort out the reason in .Lsysc_work. That avoids another two
instructions on the main system call path.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to