These files depend on Kconfig options all of which are a bool, so we use the appropriate registration function, which avoids us relying on an implicit inclusion of <module.h> which we are doing currently.
While this currently works, we really don't want to be including the module.h header in non-modular code, which we'd be forced to do, pending some upcoming code relocation from init.h into module.h. So we fix it now by using the non-modular equivalent. Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> Cc: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> Cc: Kukjin Kim <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]> --- drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c index 82d2fbb20f7e..2c2a19f035ee 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c @@ -236,4 +236,4 @@ static struct platform_driver exynos_cpufreq_platdrv = { }, .probe = exynos_cpufreq_probe, }; -module_platform_driver(exynos_cpufreq_platdrv); +builtin_platform_driver(exynos_cpufreq_platdrv); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c index b0dac7d6ba31..9e231f52150c 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c @@ -659,4 +659,4 @@ static struct platform_driver s5pv210_cpufreq_platdrv = { }, .probe = s5pv210_cpufreq_probe, }; -module_platform_driver(s5pv210_cpufreq_platdrv); +builtin_platform_driver(s5pv210_cpufreq_platdrv); -- 2.2.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
