From: He Kuang <[email protected]>

No need to test trace.evlist against NULL twice.

Signed-off-by: He Kuang <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Wang Nan <[email protected]>
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
index cbfdb9523868..96a2ebafc755 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
@@ -2721,11 +2721,10 @@ int cmd_trace(int argc, const char **argv, const char 
*prefix __maybe_unused)
        signal(SIGFPE, sighandler_dump_stack);
 
        trace.evlist = perf_evlist__new();
-       if (trace.evlist == NULL)
-               return -ENOMEM;
 
        if (trace.evlist == NULL) {
                pr_err("Not enough memory to run!\n");
+               err = -ENOMEM;
                goto out;
        }
 
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to