Commit-ID: 3e51f3c4004c9b01f66da03214a3e206f5ed627b Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/3e51f3c4004c9b01f66da03214a3e206f5ed627b Author: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Tue, 12 May 2015 16:41:51 +0200 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Tue, 19 May 2015 08:39:13 +0200
sched/preempt: Remove PREEMPT_ACTIVE unmasking off in_atomic() Now that PREEMPT_ACTIVE implies PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET, ignoring PREEMPT_ACTIVE from in_atomic() check isn't useful anymore. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> --- include/linux/preempt.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/preempt.h b/include/linux/preempt.h index 4057696..a1a00e1 100644 --- a/include/linux/preempt.h +++ b/include/linux/preempt.h @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ * used in the general case to determine whether sleeping is possible. * Do not use in_atomic() in driver code. */ -#define in_atomic() ((preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE) != 0) +#define in_atomic() (preempt_count() != 0) /* * Check whether we were atomic before we did preempt_disable(): -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
