On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:18:13PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On 05/20/2015 12:13 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This is adding a binding with no documentation, documentation is > > mandatory for all bindings. > Yes, I missed... sorry about that. Do you agree with the approach > though so I can re-spin the patches adding the missing DT binding? It's probably OK but I didn't really drill through since the binding was missing. If these parts are commodity as described it seems surprising that they aren't compatible with any existing kernel driver.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
