On Friday 22 May 2015 16:21:54 Sanchayan Maity wrote:
> +#define OCOTP_CFG0_OFFSET 0x00000410
> +#define OCOTP_CFG1_OFFSET 0x00000420
> +#define MSCM_CPxCOUNT_OFFSET 0x0000002C
> +#define MSCM_CPxCFG1_OFFSET 0x00000014
> +#define ROM_REVISION_OFFSET 0x00000080
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id vf610_soc_bus_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-mscm-cpucfg", },
> + { /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +
> +static int __init vf610_soc_init(void)
> +{
> + struct regmap *ocotp_regmap, *mscm_regmap, *rom_regmap;
> + struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
> + struct soc_device *soc_dev;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + char soc_type[] = "xx0";
> + u32 cpxcount, cpxcfg1;
> + u32 soc_id1, soc_id2, rom_rev;
> + u64 soc_id;
> + int ret;
> +
> + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, vf610_soc_bus_match);
> + if (!np)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
Why not use module_platform_driver() and make this a probe function instead?
> + ocotp_regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("fsl,vf610-ocotp");
> + if (IS_ERR(ocotp_regmap)) {
> + pr_err("regmap lookup for octop failed\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(ocotp_regmap);
> + }
> +
> + mscm_regmap =
> syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("fsl,vf610-mscm-cpucfg");
> + if (IS_ERR(mscm_regmap)) {
> + pr_err("regmap lookup for mscm failed");
> + return PTR_ERR(mscm_regmap);
> + }
> +
> + rom_regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("fsl,vf610-ocrom");
> + if (IS_ERR(rom_regmap)) {
> + pr_err("regmap lookup for ocrom failed");
> + return PTR_ERR(rom_regmap);
> + }
Can you use syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle instead, and put the
phandles in the fsl,vf610-mscm-cpucfg node?
Also, I'd argue that the mscm should not be a syscon device at all,
but instead I'd use platform_get_resource()/devm_ioremap_resource()
to get an __iomem pointer.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
