On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 03:29:06PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> @@ -788,9 +788,9 @@ int x86_schedule_events(struct cpu_hw_ev
>               x86_pmu.start_scheduling(cpuc);
>  
>       for (i = 0, wmin = X86_PMC_IDX_MAX, wmax = 0; i < n; i++) {
> +             cpuc->event_constraint[i] = NULL;

^^^ that is new, which is esp. important in light of the
intel_get_event_constraints() hunk below, which would happily continue
life with a garbage constraint.

>               c = x86_pmu.get_event_constraints(cpuc, i, cpuc->event_list[i]);
> +             cpuc->event_constraint[i] = c;
>  
>               wmin = min(wmin, c->weight);
>               wmax = max(wmax, c->weight);


> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> @@ -2106,7 +2106,7 @@ static struct event_constraint *
>  intel_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx,
>                           struct perf_event *event)
>  {
> -     struct event_constraint *c1 = event->hw.constraint;
> +     struct event_constraint *c1 = cpuc->event_constraint[idx];
>       struct event_constraint *c2;
>  
>       /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to