Am 27.05.2015 um 16:36 schrieb Will Deacon: > Hi André, > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:18:29PM +0100, André Hentschel wrote: >> From: André Hentschel <[email protected]> >> >> Since commit a4780adeefd042482f624f5e0d577bf9cdcbb760 the user writeable TLS >> register on ARM is preserved per thread. >> >> This patch does it analogous to the ARM patch, but for compat mode on ARM64. >> >> Signed-off-by: André Hentschel <[email protected]> >> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> >> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> >> >> --- >> This patch is against Linux 4.1-rc1 >> (b787f68c36d49bb1d9236f403813641efa74a031) >> >> v2: Trying to address suggestions by Will Deacon >> >> @Will Deacon: The macro you suggested is not helpful it seems, >> instead i introduced >> static functions. They also could be macros i guess, but it >> seems >> much cleaner to me to use functions as it only affects one file. > > I wanted to understand in more detail why the macro didn't work out for > you, so I trued hacking together my own version of the patch (see below). > It seems to hold up to light testing, so it would be good to know where > you ran into problems. > >> Should the final version be send to rmk's patchtracker or will someone >> else pick it up? > > This is an arm64 patch, so either Catalin or me will pick it up directly > when it's ready to be merged. > > Will
Your patch works, you can add me as Tested-by. :) My bad was that i didn't know that macro style (returning a variable conditionally with c code) Sadly no new commit by me :( -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
