Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:37:17AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: >> That's rcu_read_lock_sched_held, not rcu_held_lock_sched_held(). >> >> Also, your unlikely is weird and backwards. >> >> I changed it as below, and folded. It's in modules-next. >> >> I'm now going to do some *actual* testing, and I'll go all Torvalds on >> you if this spews warnings... > > Fair enough, I did see the build robot fail on this. How come those only > showed up now? This patch has been in your git tree for a long time; you > picked up the rcu validation patches before the other ones.
Indeed... Fengguang, is the kbuild test robot checking my pending-rebases tree? It's probably going to produce some noise (since that's where I drop unreviewed patches, too), but that's OK. Thanks, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
